The Million Dollar Question

On 26th January 2026 at 15:10 I sent a detailed email to the Trust requesting a basis for the severe sanctions employed against me. I received no response:

‘To whom it may concern,

In response to the recent correspondence from the school, I wish to make the following points. 

My communication with The Trust has consistently been characterised as demonstrating a hostility to members of staff, the school and the school community. On this basis it is claimed that the sanctions employed against me are there to protect the well-being of staff. This rationale for the sanctions is based upon a fundamental mischaracterisation of my views. 

As I have stressed on many occasions, I have a positive view of the school and its staff. My concern has always been with the actions of three members of SLT. These members of management have been prepared to deploy their command of institutional power to enact a series severe sanctions against me. They have also been responsible for disseminating a series of falsehoods to external agencies. As a consequence, I feel that I have been subject to harassment and discrimination for a period of almost three years. 

I have repeatedly asked for specific examples of what it is that I am alleged to have done wrong. Despite frequent protestation by management that such information has been provided, this is not the case. Epithets like 'distressing' and 'inappropriate' are used to describe my behaviour. However, those responsible for employing the sanctions have repeatedly failed to provide concrete examples of this misconduct.’

For 3 years I have asked the same question.

The Trust leaders have failed to provide a plausible explanation for the cruel and draconian measures they have taken against me. In addition to this, they have threatened both me and various human rights organisations for questioning the legitimacy of their decisions. Approximately one week after the first threat I was reported to the police.

During my interview under caution, the OIC accused me of causing ‘distress’ to the deputy head teacher when a human rights lawyer raised concerns about discriminatory conduct. The CPS ruled that there were no charges to be brought.

When I launched my website, I was again, reported to the police under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003. The police were unable to take any action in relation to this.

Speaking out against injustice is not a criminal offence.